THEME SECTION: STIGMA IN PSYCHIATRIC DISORDERS: REVIEW ARTICLE
Year : 2016 | Volume
: 32 | Issue : 2 | Page : 128--133
Stigma in dual diagnosis: A narrative review
Yatan Pal Singh Balhara1, Arpit Parmar1, Siddharth Sarkar1, Rohit Verma2,
1 Department of Psychiatry, National Drug Dependence Treatment Centre, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India
2 Department of Psychiatry, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India
Dr. Yatan Pal Singh Balhara
Department of Psychiatry, National Drug Dependence Treatment Centre, WHO Collaborating Centre on Substance Abuse, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi
Stigma has been described as a mark of disgrace associated with a particular person, quality, or a circumstance. Persons with either psychiatric illness or substance use disorders, their family members, caregivers, as well as health professionals engaged in the management of these persons are subject to stigma. Interestingly, there is a high prevalence of substance use disorders among persons with psychiatric disorders and vice versa. However, only a limited literature has focused on stigma in the context of co-occurrence of psychiatric disorders and substance use disorders. The current review is aimed at the presentation of various aspects of stigma in the context of dual diagnosis of psychiatric disorders and substance use disorders. Findings on the published literature on stigma in the context of psychiatric disorders and substance use disorders have been examined separately to develop an understanding into the relevance and implication of addressing stigma in the context of dual diagnosis.
|How to cite this article:|
Balhara YP, Parmar A, Sarkar S, Verma R. Stigma in dual diagnosis: A narrative review.Indian J Soc Psychiatry 2016;32:128-133
|How to cite this URL:|
Balhara YP, Parmar A, Sarkar S, Verma R. Stigma in dual diagnosis: A narrative review. Indian J Soc Psychiatry [serial online] 2016 [cited 2022 Jun 28 ];32:128-133
Available from: https://www.indjsp.org/text.asp?2016/32/2/128/181093
Stigma has been described as “a mark of disgrace associated with a particular person, quality, or a circumstance.” This modern concept of stigma has gained increasing attention from researchers over the past few decades. Three levels of stigma have been identified in the literature-public, structural, and internalized stigma. Public stigma is a stigma in which large social groups endorse stereotypes and discrimination about mental illness and act against individuals who are mentally ill. Structural stigma signifies institutional practices and policies that create an environment of inequality and restrict opportunities for persons with mental illness. Internalized stigma (commonly known as self-stigma) is characterized by negative feelings about self and is accompanied by identity transformation, stereotype endorsement, and maladaptive behavior. It results from persons' past experiences and perceptions, or anticipation of negative social reactions on the basis of their mental illness. Public stigma has been studied extensively and is the most prominent form which is observed among the general population. It reflects the prejudice general population has toward those with mental illnesses.
Stigma has been studied in the context of various medical disorders (like leprosy, tuberculosis, and AIDS), physical disabilities, economic constraints, and persons with homoerotic preferences., A considerable number of studies related to stigma have also been conducted for mental illnesses. Persons with either psychiatric illness or substance use disorders, their family members, caregivers, as well as health professionals engaged in the management of these persons are subjected to stigma. Interestingly, there is a high prevalence of substance use disorders among persons with psychiatric disorders and vice versa. However, only a limited literature has focused on stigma in the context of co-occurrence of psychiatric disorders and substance use disorders. The current review is aimed at presentation of various aspects of stigma in the context of dual diagnosis of psychiatric disorders and substance use disorders. Findings on the published literature on stigma in the context of psychiatric disorders and substance use disorders have been examined separately to develop an understanding into the relevance and implication of addressing stigma in the context of dual diagnosis.
Stigma and Psychiatric Disorders
Stigma has been studied extensively in the context of the psychiatric disorders. It is necessary to understand the various facets of stigma in psychiatric disorders, as it is an important determinant of the help-seeking, treatment outcome, as well as quality of life of persons with psychiatric disorders.
Self-stigma (internalized stigma)
Self-stigma is defined as a subjective process that is embedded within a social context and is characterized by negative feelings about oneself, maladaptive behaviors, and stereotype endorsement. It results because of an individual's past experiences, perceptions, and anticipation of negative social reactions to the individual's psychiatric illness. Negative stereotypes (e.g. people with psychiatric illness are not productive) are prevalent in the society. People agreeing to these stereotypes develop prejudice which ultimately leads to discrimination. Because of this, people with psychiatric illness are also vulnerable to endorse such stereotypical attitudes toward themselves. Self-stigma proceeds through stages of awareness (person knows about prevalent stereotypes), agreement (persons starts believing those stereotypes to be true), and finally application (person starts endorsing the same stereotype about him/herself). These leads the negative emotional reactions such as poor self-efficacy and decreased self-esteem. This may further cause self-stigmatization and self-isolation leading to adverse consequences like decreased health care use, poor disease outcome, poor quality of life, and interference with the achievement of life goals.,
Structural stigma is defined as the stigma created by the structures (institutional policies and practices) that surround a person with psychiatric illness. Psychiatric illnesses are reported in a more pejorative way in newspapers as compared to the medical journals. Such media provide distorted view of psychiatric illnesses and also equate it with dangerousness, unpredictability, and criminality. The terms used to describe persons with psychiatric illness in everyday life are also pejorative which leads to profound effects on lives of persons suffering from psychiatric illness. Police also consider persons with psychiatric illness as less responsible and with violence potential. Even among health care (including psychiatric health care) such discrimination has been reported., Medical students have also been reported to have negative attitude toward people with psychiatric illness.
Public stigma is defined as a set of negative attitudes/beliefs about persons with psychiatric illness that turns individuals against them and leads them to avoid, fear, or discriminate against those with psychiatric illness. Studies suggest that most people consider persons with psychiatric illness to be dangerous.,,,, Patients with psychiatric illnesses such as schizophrenia and depression are more likely to be considered violent as compared to individuals without these conditions. Similar finding have also been reported for children with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) as compared to children with illness like asthma. People also feel threatened by persons with psychiatric illness and such threat varies across different illness.,, Persons with schizophrenia are more likely to be considered as dangerous to others as compared to patients with depression, while patients with depression are seen more dangerous to themselves., Sociodemographics also contribute to such threat perception. For example, girls are considered more dangerous as compared to boys, while younger children (<8 years) are considered more dangerous as compared to older children (>14 years). Stigmatizing beliefs related to criminality have also been consistently reported in association with psychiatric illnesses such as schizophrenia, depression, and ADHD. Adults with psychiatric illness are considered as less competent about taking decisions on treatment-related as well as financial issues. Children with psychiatric illness are considered to be lazy as compared to children with an illness like asthma. Moreover, children consider illness like ADHD to be more shameful as compared to asthma and other medical illnesses.
Stigma and Substance Use Disorders
Persons with substance use disorders also face stigma in its various forms, including perceived, public, and self-stigma. Previous studies consistently report that persons with substance use disorders experience stigma which leads to multiple negative outcomes including delay in treatment seeking. Due to associated stigma, such persons are considered to be dangerous, threat to others, and incompetent to take responsibility. Previous studies suggest that persons with substance disorders are more likely to be viewed as dangerous as compared to “normal” persons., Patients with drug dependence problems are considered to be more dangerous as compared to other mental illnesses.,, Similarly, persons with alcohol use disorders are also considered to be more dangerous to themselves. Studies also suggest that persons with substance use disorder are considered less competent to take their treatment decisions as well as financial decisions as compared to persons with depression and other mental illnesses by overwhelming majority of respondents. Social distance from persons with substance use disorder is also widespread. Persons with alcohol use elicited a significantly higher desire for social distance among adults., For adults with mental illness, the desire for social distance is maximum for substance users followed by other mental illnesses such as schizophrenia and depression.,,
Stigma in Dual Diagnosis Patients
As already discussed, stigma in mental disorders including substance use disorders is probably the highest among those diagnosed with any illness. However, studies focusing on stigma among persons with dual diagnosis (persons with co-occurring psychiatric illness and substance use disorders) are scarce. Whether such patients experience stigma differently or at a higher level is largely unknown. Measuring stigma and discrimination through single domains may underestimate the effects for persons experiencing multiple types of stigmas (in this case stigma of substance abuse along with psychiatric illness) or ignore the potential interactions. However, patients with dual diagnosis are known to suffer from various kinds of stigma which leads to treatment noncompliance, reduced self-esteem, social exclusion, discrimination, and relapse. It is also important to consider where and with whom such persons identify themselves. One hypothesis suggests that persons with both psychiatric illness and substance use disorders prefer to be aligned with the substance users as they perceive it to be more acceptable., The lack of meaning among patients with certain psychiatric disorders triggers use of the substance and once substance use is initiated, it creates a meaning and identity and the person feels part of a group or network.
One of the initial studies conducted on 84 men with dual diagnosis reported enduring effects of stigma on the well-being of patients despite improvement in their symptoms of psychiatric illness as well as substance use disorder. Most persons reported a feeling of being stigmatized and rejected because of their substance use and mental health problems. They also agreed on the fact that the dually diagnosed individuals are devalued and discriminated against. Most participants suggested that they would be rejected, had experienced rejection by others, and had taken steps to avoid such rejection. Authors reported that such stigma continued to complicate the lives of stigmatized individuals despite symptomatic and functional improvement in all domains after a year and concluded about the need to address the associated stigma in order to maximize the improvement and well-being of these persons. However, due to unavailability of the control arm (patients with only mental illness or substance use disorder), details on the qualitative and quantitative differences in the stigma experienced between these two populations are unavailable.
A more recent pilot study among 49 subjects with co-occurring schizophrenia and substance use disorders reported an association between self-stigma and decreased self-esteem. Alcohol use severity along with dysphoria was also negatively associated with self-esteem. Stereotype concurrence in these subjects mediated the relationship between autistic preoccupation and self-esteem.
Similarly, a qualitative study on stigma about substance use among persons with co-occurring disorders identified five themes: “addict,” “self-esteem,” “family and friends,” “health care workers,” and “work.” All of them reported stigma coming from aspects of being labeled as “addict” which affected their self-esteem. Other major sources of stigma included family and friends as well as health care workers which affected their career. Similarly, “labeled” and “self-esteem” themes were related to the mental health question related to stigma.
Implications of Stigma
The implications of stigma are varied, diverse, and affect almost all life areas of the affected individual. Results of two independent surveys (done on more than 2000 English and American citizens) suggested three themes of stigmatizing attitudes - fear and exclusion which means that such persons should be feared and kept out of the communities; authoritarianism which means that such persons are irresponsible, and so their life decisions should be taken by others and benevolence which means that such persons need to be cared for.,
Not only stigma causes reduced autonomy and self-efficacy, but it is also associated with less treatment seeking, and worse treatment retention and adherence., However, a more recent study from the USA reported that there was an improvement in treatment seeking by people with mental illness between the years of 1999 and 2003, with more persons with mental illness who are willing, comfortable, and less embarrassed for seeking treatment for their mental health problems. Importantly, there was no change in the perception regarding the treatment effectiveness or chances of recovering from illness without treatment. Most recent studies suggest that people have become more receptive toward the treatment for their mental health problems., Preference for treatment seeking also depends on the nature of the psychiatric illness. However, coercive treatments are considered more acceptable for illnesses like schizophrenia and substance use disorders as compared to depression.
The patients with any type of psychiatric illness are more likely to face discrimination while searching for housing and employment., Since these persons are considered less competent to take their own decisions, they are forced to received coercive treatment and have reduced independence. The perception of incompetence also varies with the type of illness with persons with substance use disorder considered to be most incompetent to make their financial decisions. Other consequences of such discriminatory behavior include fewer opportunities in housing, employment, school admission, as well as discrimination at workplaces making reintegration into the community harder even after improvement of psychiatric symptoms.
Implications for dual diagnosis
Although impact of stigma have been widely studied in psychiatric illness and substance use disorders in isolation, the same has not been the case for persons with dual diagnosis. It is important to note that substance abuse and psychiatric illness are common comorbid conditions. This comorbid relationship is likely to be more prevalent over time as the incidence of substance abuse tends to increase after the onset of psychiatric illness and vice versa. This high prevalence is associated with the high level of need. More importantly, in persons with dual diagnosis, there is an even larger unmet need as compared to those with only psychiatric illness. Most such persons do not receive any kind of formal treatment., A survey from USA reported that 72% of persons with co-occurring disorders did not receive any formal psychiatric or substance use treatment in the past year. Only 8% of them received both specialty substance use and psychiatric treatment as recommended to them. This might be the result of higher stigma and more barriers to formal treatment. Moreover, even among those receiving formal treatment for one of the two conditions, the other might get undetected and consequently remain untreated. A study done at substance abuse treatment center in New Jersey reported that only 22% of persons meeting criteria for dual diagnosis were recognized as having co-occurring mental illness by their treating doctors. Despite recognition of mental illness, only 58% were referred for further management of mental illness. This has been attributed to the structural discrimination which is influenced by vague institutional boundaries, and lack of role clarity in the health care system.
Even when such persons receive treatment, there are disparities in the care provided. Compared to the psychiatric illnesses, persons with dual diagnosis were least likely to receive recommended nutrition and exercise counseling. Another study found that such persons are more likely to undergo surgery from “low-quality” cardiac surgeons. This is attributed to various factors including poor therapeutic alliance, negative attitude of treatment provider, and diagnostic overshadowing (i.e., erroneously attributing physical symptoms to mental illness resulting in under-recognition of physical illness). However, most studies did not investigate potential interaction of substance abuse and psychiatric illness on the health care provided to persons with dual diagnosis.
Apart from the discrimination faced in treatment, the exclusion of persons with dual diagnosis from most substance abuse and psychiatric illness research studies is also an important issue. Research studies often include “pure” rather than “typical” patients seen in the communities. Hence, it impedes the generalizability of the findings about treatment and services given to persons with dual diagnosis.
Interventions to Reduce Stigma
Approaches to reduce stigma associated with psychiatric illness
The target audience for stigma reduction includes general public, patients, and health care professionals. Three approaches have been suggested to reduce stigma - education, protest, and contact. Education provides the information about the psychiatric illness and so it helps the public to make more informed decisions about psychiatric illness. This approach has been studied extensively in the past. Studies suggest that persons with better understanding of psychiatric illness are less likely to endorse stigma.,, Similarly, studies also suggest that participation in educational programs on psychiatric illness also leads to improved attitude about psychiatric illness.,
Protest includes protesting the hostile and inaccurate representations of persons with psychiatric illness as a way to challenge the stigma. This strategy includes media (to stop reporting the inaccurate representation of persons with psychiatric illness) and public (to stop believing such representations). As it is a reactive strategy, it only attempts to diminish the negative attitudes of illness and does not focus on promoting positive attitudes that are supported by facts. Moreover, studies supporting such a strategy are scarce and so there is a need for future research in this direction.
Studies have also shown an inverse relationship between having a contact with a person with psychiatric illness and endorsing discrimination and stigma toward them. Stigma is diminished when general public meet such persons who are able to live good lives despite an illness or live as good neighbors or are able to hold down jobs.
Approaches to reduce stigma associated with substance use disorders
Various approaches targeted at persons substance use disorders, general population, and medical professionals have been studied. A recent systematic review of 13 studies suggested a range of interventions to be effective to reduce such stigma. Group-based acceptance and commitment therapy was found to be effective to reduce self-stigma. Motivational interviewing and communicating positive stories of persons with substance use disorders were found to be effective for addressing social stigma. Contact-based training and education programs targeted at medical students and professionals like police were effective in changing structural stigma. The evidence suggests that interventions do have an impact on the stigma with small to moderate effect sizes.
Published literature on addressing stigma among those with dual diagnosis is conspicuous by its absence. While it might seem alluring to extrapolate the findings from studies among those with either psychiatric illness or substance use disorders alone to the persons with dual diagnosis, it might be an oversimplification of the complex issue of stigma. As described earlier, the stigma experienced by persons with dual diagnosis is likely to differ from the stigma experienced by those with either psychiatric illness of substance use disorder both quantitatively as well as qualitatively. Hence, it is important to study the stigma specifically in the context of dual diagnosis. In addition, comparative studies on stigma should be planned for dual diagnosis vis-a-vis psychiatric illness and substance use disorders.
Conclusions and Future Directions
Stigma plays an important role in lives of those with either psychiatric illness or substance use disorder patients. The same is true for those with dual diagnosis. The consequences of such stigma and discrimination are often pervasive and long-term. Despite this, the stigma and discrimination in dual diagnosis have not been studied systematically and very little is known about the impact of stigma among persons with dual diagnosis. Although it is known that stigma is an important barrier to treatment for people with psychiatric illness and substance use disorders, persons with dual diagnosis may experience stigma differently. Not only is there a possibly of higher levels of stigma among those with dual diagnosis, but it is also likely that this stigma could be qualitatively different from the stigma among those with psychiatric illness or substance use disorders. Developing an understanding into the stigma in the context of dual diagnosis will be important to help these persons, their family members, caregivers, and treatment providers.
Financial support and sponsorship
Conflicts of interest
There are no conflicts of interest.
|1||Link BG, Phelan JC. Conceptualizing stigma. Annu Rev Sociol 2001;27:363-85.|
|2||Opala J, Boillot F. Leprosy among the Limba: Illness and healing in the context of world view. Soc Sci Med 1996;42:3-19.|
|3||Chan BT, Weiser SD, Boum Y, Siedner MJ, Mocello AR, Haberer JE, et al. Persistent HIV-related stigma in rural Uganda during a period of increasing HIV incidence despite treatment expansion. AIDS 2015;29:83-90.|
|4||Clement S, Schauman O, Graham T, Maggioni F, Evans-Lacko S, Bezborodovs N, et al. What is the impact of mental health-related stigma on help-seeking? A systematic review of quantitative and qualitative studies. Psychol Med 2015;45:11-27.|
|5||Regier DA, Farmer ME, Rae DS, Locke BZ, Keith SJ, Judd LL, et al. Comorbidity of mental disorders with alcohol and other drug abuse. Results from the Epidemiologic Catchment Area (ECA) Study. JAMA 1990;264:2511-8.|
|6||Corrigan PW, Bink AB, Schmidt A, Jones N, Rüsch N. What is the impact of self-stigma? Loss of self-respect and the “why try” effect. J Ment Health 2015;13:1-6.|
|7||Corrigan PW, Powell KJ, Rüsch N. How does stigma affect work in people with serious mental illnesses? Psychiatr Rehabil J 2012;35:381-4.|
|8||Watson AC, Corrigan P, Larson JE, Sells M. Self-stigma in people with mental illness. Schizophr Bull 2007;33:1312-8.|
|9||Corrigan PW, Watson AC. The stigma of psychiatric disorders and the gender, ethnicity, and education of the perceiver. Community Ment Health J 2007;43:439-58.|
|10||Corrigan PW, Larson JE, Rüsch N. Self-stigma and the “why try” effect: Impact on life goals and evidence-based practices. World Psychiatry 2009;8:75-81.|
|11||Day DM, Page S. Portrayal of mental illness in Canadian newspapers. Can J Psychiatry 1986;31:813-7.|
|12||Buizza C, Schulze B, Bertocchi E, Rossi G, Ghilardi A, Pioli R. The stigma of schizophrenia from patients' and relatives' view: A pilot study in an Italian rehabilitation residential care unit. Clin Pract Epidemiol Ment Health 2007;3:23.|
|13||Watson AC, Corrigan PW, Ottati V. Police officers' attitudes toward and decisions about persons with mental illness. Psychiatr Serv 2004;55:49-53.|
|14||Lloyd C, Sullivan D, Williams PL. Perceptions of social stigma and its effect on interpersonal relationships of young males who experience a psychotic disorder. Aust Occup Ther J 2005;52:243-50.|
|15||González-Torres MA, Oraa R, Arístegui M, Fernández-Rivas A, Guimon J. Stigma and discrimination towards people with schizophrenia and their family members. A qualitative study with focus groups. Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol 2007;42:14-23.|
|16||Adewuya AO, Oguntade AA. Doctors' attitude towards people with mental illness in Western Nigeria. Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol 2007;42:931-6.|
|17||Corrigan PW, Penn DL. Lessons from social psychology on discrediting psychiatric stigma. Am Psychol 1999;54:765-76.|
|18||Neki JS. Problems of motivation affecting the psychiatrist, the general practitioner and the public in their interactions in the field of mental health. Indian J Psychiatry 1966;8:117.|
|19||Dube KC. A study of prevalence and biosocial variables in mental illness in a rural and an urban community in Uttar Pradesh – India. Acta Psychiatr Scand 1970;46:327-59.|
|20||Wig NN, Suleiman MA, Routledge R, Murthy RS, Ladrido-Ignacio L, Ibrahim HH, et al. Community reactions to mental disorders. A key informant study in three developing countries. Acta Psychiatr Scand 1980;61:111-26.|
|21||Martin JK, Pescosolido BA, Tuch SA. Of fear and loathing: The role of 'disturbing behavior, 'labels, and causal attributions in shaping public attitudes toward people with mental illness. J Health Soc Behav 2000;1:208-23.|
|22||Murthy RS. Stigma of mental illness in the third world. Perspectives on the stigma of mental illness.Perspectives on the stigma of mental illness: New York; 2005. p. 102-20.|
|23||Perry BL, Pescosolido BA, Martin JK, McLeod JD, Jensen PS. Comparison of public attributions, attitudes, and stigma in regard to depression among children and adults. Psychiatr Serv 2007;58:632-5.|
|24||Link BG, Phelan JC, Bresnahan M, Stueve A, Pescosolido BA. Public conceptions of mental illness: Labels, causes, dangerousness, and social distance. Am J Public Health 1999;89:1328-33.|
|25||Anglin DM, Link BG, Phelan JC. Racial differences in stigmatizing attitudes toward people with mental illness. Psychiatr Serv 2006;57:857-62.|
|26||Rao D, Feinglass J, Corrigan P. Racial and ethnic disparities in mental illness stigma. J Nerv Ment Dis 2007;195:1020-3.|
|27||Walker JS, Coleman D, Lee J, Squire PN, Friesen BJ. Children's stigmatization of childhood depression and ADHD: Magnitude and demographic variation in a national sample. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry 2008;47:912-20.|
|28||Pescosolido BA, Monahan J, Link BG, Stueve A, Kikuzawa S. The public's view of the competence, dangerousness, and need for legal coercion of persons with mental health problems. Am J Public Health 1999;89:1339-45.|
|29||Link BG, Yang LH, Phelan JC, Collins PY. Measuring mental illness stigma. Schizophr Bull 2004;30:511-41.|
|30||Luoma JB, Twohig MP, Waltz T, Hayes SC, Roget N, Padilla M, et al. An investigation of stigma in individuals receiving treatment for substance abuse. Addict Behav 2007;32:1331-46.|
|31||Evans-Lacko S, Thornicroft G. Stigma among people with dual diagnosis and implications for health services. Adv Dual Diagn 2010;3:4-7.|
|32||Hamilton I. The 10 most important debates surrounding dual diagnosis. Adv Dual Diagn 2014;7:118-28.|
|33||Gournay K, Sandford T, Johnson S, Thornicroft G. Dual diagnosis of severe mental health problems and substance abuse/dependence: A major priority for mental health nursing. J Psychiatr Ment Health Nurs 1997;4:89-95.|
|34||Phillips P. The mad, the bad, and the dangerous-harm reduction in dual diagnosis. Int J Drug Policy 1998;9:345-9.|
|35||Thompson G. A meaning-centered therapy for addictions. Int J Ment Health Addict 2012;10:428-40.|
|36||Link BG, Struening EL, Rahav M, Phelan JC, Nuttbrock L. On stigma and its consequences: Evidence from a longitudinal study of men with dual diagnoses of mental illness and substance abuse. J Health Soc Behav 1997;38:177-90.|
|37||Rodrigues S, Serper M, Novak S, Corrigan P, Hobart M, Ziedonis M, et al. Self-stigma, self-esteem, and co-occurring disorders. J Dual Diagn 2013;9:129-33.|
|38||Giglia LA. The co-occurring disorder patient: Effects of stigma, perception of care, and treatment.Counselor Education Master's Theses: New York; 2014.|
|39||Taylor SM, Dear MJ. Scaling community attitudes toward the mentally ill. Schizophr Bull 1981;7:225-40.|
|40||Brockington IF, Hall P, Levings J, Murphy C. The community's tolerance of the mentally ill. Br J Psychiatry 1993;162:93-9.|
|41||Pescosolido BA, Perry BL, Martin JK, McLeod JD, Jensen PS. Stigmatizing attitudes and beliefs about treatment and psychiatric medications for children with mental illness. Psychiatr Serv 2007;58:613-8.|
|42||Corrigan PW, Shapiro JR. Measuring the impact of programs that challenge the public stigma of mental illness. Clin Psychol Rev 2010;30:907-22.|
|43||Mojtabai R. Americans' attitudes toward mental health treatment seeking: 1990-2003. Psychiatr Serv 2007;58:642-51.|
|44||Pescosolido BA, Martin JK, Long JS, Medina TR, Phelan JC, Link BG. “A disease like any other”? A decade of change in public reactions to schizophrenia, depression, and alcohol dependence. Am J Psychiatry 2010;167:1321-30.|
|45||Blumner KH, Marcus SC. Changing perceptions of depression: Ten-year trends from the general social survey. Psychiatr Serv 2009;60:306-12.|
|46||Corbière M, Zaniboni S, Lecomte T, Bond G, Gilles PY, Lesage A, et al. Job acquisition for people with severe mental illness enrolled in supported employment programs: A theoretically grounded empirical study. J Occup Rehabil 2011;21:342-54.|
|47||Stuart H, Arboleda-Florez J, Sartorius N. Stigma and mental disorders: International perspectives. World Psychiatry 2005;4:1-62.|
|48||Cantwell R, Brewin J, Glazebrook C, Dalkin T, Fox R, Medley I, et al. Prevalence of substance misuse in first-episode psychosis. Br J Psychiatry 1999;174:150-3.|
|49||Wright S, Gournay K, Glorney E, Thornicroft G. Dual diagnosis in the suburbs: Prevalence, need, and in-patient service use. Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol 2000;35:297-304.|
|50||Alonso J, Codony M, Kovess V, Angermeyer MC, Katz SJ, Haro JM, et al. Population level of unmet need for mental healthcare in Europe. Br J Psychiatry 2007;190:299-306.|
|51||Compton WM, Thomas YF, Stinson FS, Grant BF. Prevalence, correlates, disability, and comorbidity of DSM-IV drug abuse and dependence in the United States: Results from the national epidemiologic survey on alcohol and related conditions. Arch Gen Psychiatry 2007;64:566-76.|
|52||Watkins KE, Burnam A, Kung FY, Paddock S. A national survey of care for persons with co-occurring mental and substance use disorders. Psychiatr Serv 2001;52:1062-8.|
|53||Hu HM, Kline A, Huang FY, Ziedonis DM. Detection of co-occurring mental illness among adult patients in the New Jersey substance abuse treatment system. Am J Public Health 2006;96:1785-93.|
|54||Ridgely MS, Goldman HH, Willenbring M. Barriers to the care of persons with dual diagnoses: Organizational and financing issues. Schizophr Bull 1990;16:123-32.|
|55||Desai MM, Rosenheck RA, Druss BG, Perlin JB. Receipt of nutrition and exercise counseling among medical outpatients with psychiatric and substance use disorders. J Gen Intern Med 2002;17:556-60.|
|56||Li Y, Glance LG, Cai X, Mukamel DB. Are patients with coexisting mental disorders more likely to receive CABG surgery from low-quality cardiac surgeons? The experience in New York state. Med Care 2007;45:587-93.|
|57||Mitchell AJ, Malone D, Doebbeling CC. Quality of medical care for people with and without comorbid mental illness and substance misuse: Systematic review of comparative studies. Br J Psychiatry 2009;194:491-9.|
|58||Blanco C, Olfson M, Okuda M, Nunes EV, Liu SM, Hasin DS. Generalizability of clinical trials for alcohol dependence to community samples. Drug Alcohol Depend 2008;98:123-8.|
|59||Dalky HF. Mental illness stigma reduction interventions: Review of intervention trials. West J Nurs Res 2012;34:520-47.|
|60||Roman PM, Floyd HH Jr. Social acceptance of psychiatric illness and psychiatric treatment. Soc Psychiatry 1981;16:21-9.|
|61||Link BG, Cullen FT. Contact with the mentally ill and perceptions of how dangerous they are. J Health Soc Behav 1986;27:289-302.|
|62||Corrigan PW, River LP, Lundin RK, Penn DL, Uphoff-Wasowski K, Campion J, et al. Three strategies for changing attributions about severe mental illness. Schizophr Bull 2001;27:187-95.|
|63||Holmes EP, Corrigan PW, Williams P, Canar J, Kubiak MA. Changing attitudes about schizophrenia. Schizophr Bull 1999;25:447-56.|
|64||Livingston JD, Milne T, Fang ML, Amari E. The effectiveness of interventions for reducing stigma related to substance use disorders: A systematic review. Addiction 2012;107:39-50.|